Wednesday, September 30, 2026 300 stories · 2717 outlet reports compared

GAO says Trump administration's $810 million spending cancellation was unconstitutional

The Government Accountability Office ruled that President Donald Trump cannot cancel more than $800 million in federal spending approved by Congress, saying the administration's use of a procedure called pocket rescissions exceeded its constitutional authority.

By The Lumen desk · Sept 30, 2026 · 1 min read
Share Save
From The Lumen
Your brand, here.Reach readers who see every side of the story.Advertise with us
What we know
1 The GAO ruled that the Trump administration's cancellation of roughly $810 million in federal funding was unconstitutional, according to Deseret News.
2 The cuts were carried out through a process called pocket rescissions, per Deseret News and Hot Air.
3 The GAO sent a letter to Vice President JD Vance and top congressional members on Tuesday, according to Deseret News.
4 The dispute centers on which branch of government — the White House or Congress — holds authority over federal spending, per Deseret News.

A federal watchdog has ruled that President Donald Trump's decision to cancel roughly $810 million in federal funding was unconstitutional. The nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) found the administration's unilateral spending cuts exceeded its constitutional authority, according to Deseret News.

From The Lumen · story continues below
Our mission
One story. Every side. You decide what to make of it.
Join free

The cuts were made through a process known as pocket rescissions, described by Deseret News as a rarely used and legally questionable procedure. Hot Air reported that Trump invoked this rare authority to cancel nearly $1 billion in spending that had been approved by Congress.

According to Deseret News, the GAO sent a letter on Tuesday to Vice President JD Vance and top members of Congress outlining its conclusion. The ruling escalates a dispute between the White House and congressional appropriators over which branch holds budget authority, Deseret News reported.

Associated Press, NewsNation and Newsmax all reported the core finding: that the watchdog says Trump cannot cancel more than $800 million in spending approved by Congress.

How each side covered it

Left

1 outlet
  • Associated Press reported the GAO's finding that Trump cannot cancel more than $800 million in spending approved by Congress.

“Watchdog says Trump can’t cancel more than $800M in spending approved by Congress” — Associated Press

Center

1 outlet
  • NewsNation reported the same core finding as left-leaning outlets, that the watchdog blocked cancellation of more than $800 million.

“Watchdog says Trump can’t cancel more than $800M in spending approved by Congress” — NewsNation

Right

3 outlets
  • Deseret News detailed the GAO's letter to Vice President JD Vance and congressional leaders and called the cuts unconstitutional.
  • Deseret News and Hot Air both described the funding cancellation as carried out via pocket rescissions.
  • Hot Air framed the story as Trump invoking a rare authority to cancel nearly $1 billion in spending.
  • Newsmax's headline matched the center and left framing, stating the watchdog said Trump can't cancel $800 million in spending.

“Federal watchdog: Trump canceling $810 million in government funding was unconstitutional” — Deseret News

Questions readers ask

What did the Government Accountability Office rule?

The GAO ruled that President Donald Trump's administration could not cancel more than $800 million in federal spending that Congress had approved, finding the cancellation unconstitutional, according to Deseret News.

How did the Trump administration cancel the spending?

The administration used a process called pocket rescissions, described by Deseret News and Hot Air as a rarely used and legally questionable procedure, to cancel roughly $810 million in funding.

Who was notified of the GAO's ruling?

According to Deseret News, the GAO sent a letter outlining its conclusion to Vice President JD Vance and top members of Congress on Tuesday.

Why does this dispute matter?

The ruling escalates a conflict between the White House and congressional appropriators over which branch holds constitutional authority to control federal spending, per Deseret News.

Sources · 5 outlet reports

Advertise with The Lumen
Put your brand in front of readers who read to the end
Talk to us about placements. advertise@thelumen.io

More in Politics

All Politics ›

Appeals court declines to pause sanctions against Trump's lawyers in IRS case

Sept 30, 2026 · More from the right

California bans law enforcement use of electric-shock gloves

Sept 30, 2026 · Blindspot: Right

Sen. John Kennedy grills Jack Smith at Senate Judiciary Committee hearing

Sept 30, 2026 · More from the right